<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Product Review: Sony BRAVIA XBR Series KDL-52XBR9 52-Inch 1080p 240 Hz LCD HDTV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.topratedhdtv.com/product-review-sony-bravia-xbr-series-kdl-52xbr9-52-inch-1080p-240-hz-lcd-hdtv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.topratedhdtv.com/product-review-sony-bravia-xbr-series-kdl-52xbr9-52-inch-1080p-240-hz-lcd-hdtv/</link>
	<description>Voted By Consumer Reviewers. Compare Reviews, Ratings &#38; Prices for Black Friday Season 2011</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 22:12:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas @ Satellite TV</title>
		<link>http://www.topratedhdtv.com/product-review-sony-bravia-xbr-series-kdl-52xbr9-52-inch-1080p-240-hz-lcd-hdtv/comment-page-1/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas @ Satellite TV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 08:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.topratedhdtv.com/?p=18#comment-87</guid>
		<description>What I can say about Sony Bravia. It&#039;s the best of all. From my point of view no other HDTV  can beat Sony. Only the Brand name is more than enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I can say about Sony Bravia. It&#8217;s the best of all. From my point of view no other HDTV  can beat Sony. Only the Brand name is more than enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince</title>
		<link>http://www.topratedhdtv.com/product-review-sony-bravia-xbr-series-kdl-52xbr9-52-inch-1080p-240-hz-lcd-hdtv/comment-page-1/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 07:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.topratedhdtv.com/?p=18#comment-77</guid>
		<description>You are lucky your TV lasted 2 years . My VAIO lasted only 6 months and I paid an obscene price for it. The processor was fried they said,due to liquid exposure which was not covered under warranty. The liquid exposure or whatever sure as hell did not happen at my end, but they refused to listen. 
SONY sucks and I am never going anywhere near them ever.
If any one decides to launch a class suite against them you sure as hell can count on me for support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are lucky your TV lasted 2 years . My VAIO lasted only 6 months and I paid an obscene price for it. The processor was fried they said,due to liquid exposure which was not covered under warranty. The liquid exposure or whatever sure as hell did not happen at my end, but they refused to listen.<br />
SONY sucks and I am never going anywhere near them ever.<br />
If any one decides to launch a class suite against them you sure as hell can count on me for support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan Kapuscinski</title>
		<link>http://www.topratedhdtv.com/product-review-sony-bravia-xbr-series-kdl-52xbr9-52-inch-1080p-240-hz-lcd-hdtv/comment-page-1/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan Kapuscinski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 04:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.topratedhdtv.com/?p=18#comment-64</guid>
		<description>I too was a fan of Sony and the Sony Bravia models until early this year when I learned they (Sony) do not stand behind their products. 

In January 2007 we recieved a gift from a family member of a 40 inch Sony Bravia LCD television, I will point out that the set by its serial number was manufactured in 2006 and purchased in December 2006. At this time I could have purchased an extended warranty however the fact that the television was a Sony I did not feel the need. (Should point out we already had 2 other Sony Bravia televisions in the house. One might ask why I did not take out the extended warranty. The answer is simple my experience had been that Sony manufactured quality products and why would I take out a warranty on a product I had faith in. I most certainly would have taken out the warranty if it had been a no name brand however, this was a SONY.
In January of 2009 I noted a small black line had started to appeared at the top of the screen and over the next six months grew to be a half inch wide 13 inch long line down the centre of the screen.  I contacted the local Sony representative and explained the problem providing a photograph of the serial number as requested.  I was then told they would attempt to make it right.  It appears that making it right in Sony terms is to inform me that they would have to replace the screen at a cost to me of approximately $1,200.00.  Then to add insult to injury they informed me that the labor costs ($280.00) associated to this would also be my responsibility.

Now I recognize that electronics do have a life expectancy however I believe 2 years for a television is unacceptable.

I will never purchase another Sony product and while this decision is unlikely to adversely affect Sony&#039;s bottom line one can be sure that I will share this story with everyone of my friends who I am certain will share the story with their friends.
In addition I am exploring the idea of starting a blog to share my displeasure with what I once believed to be a quality manufacturer. 

Thank you for the opportunity to express my views.

Sincerely,

Brendan Kapuscinski</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too was a fan of Sony and the Sony Bravia models until early this year when I learned they (Sony) do not stand behind their products. </p>
<p>In January 2007 we recieved a gift from a family member of a 40 inch Sony Bravia LCD television, I will point out that the set by its serial number was manufactured in 2006 and purchased in December 2006. At this time I could have purchased an extended warranty however the fact that the television was a Sony I did not feel the need. (Should point out we already had 2 other Sony Bravia televisions in the house. One might ask why I did not take out the extended warranty. The answer is simple my experience had been that Sony manufactured quality products and why would I take out a warranty on a product I had faith in. I most certainly would have taken out the warranty if it had been a no name brand however, this was a SONY.<br />
In January of 2009 I noted a small black line had started to appeared at the top of the screen and over the next six months grew to be a half inch wide 13 inch long line down the centre of the screen.  I contacted the local Sony representative and explained the problem providing a photograph of the serial number as requested.  I was then told they would attempt to make it right.  It appears that making it right in Sony terms is to inform me that they would have to replace the screen at a cost to me of approximately $1,200.00.  Then to add insult to injury they informed me that the labor costs ($280.00) associated to this would also be my responsibility.</p>
<p>Now I recognize that electronics do have a life expectancy however I believe 2 years for a television is unacceptable.</p>
<p>I will never purchase another Sony product and while this decision is unlikely to adversely affect Sony&#8217;s bottom line one can be sure that I will share this story with everyone of my friends who I am certain will share the story with their friends.<br />
In addition I am exploring the idea of starting a blog to share my displeasure with what I once believed to be a quality manufacturer. </p>
<p>Thank you for the opportunity to express my views.</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>Brendan Kapuscinski</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

